THE SHASTA TIMES

Local News and Reporting for Shasta County, California

Back to Front PageThe Shasta Times • Shasta County, California

Data Center Revolt, a Shuttered Auditorium, and a $74 Million Water Project: Inside Redding’s Compounding Municipal Clashes

Redding City Council scraps data center recruitment at Stillwater, navigates the collapse of Advance Redding at the Civic Auditorium, and greenlights a $74 million water intake replacement.

Sunday, September 27, 2026
9 min read

REDDING, Calif. — Redding City Hall has entered an intense period of administrative restructuring and fiscal reckoning as municipal leaders confront a projected $3 million general fund deficit, grassroots community pushback against industrial tech recruitment, and the operational collapse of the city’s premier entertainment venue.

Under Interim City Manager Michael Webb—who stepped into executive leadership following the sudden passing of City Manager William Tarbox—the Redding City Council is navigating difficult trade-offs. In attempting to steady municipal balances following the defeat of the Measure A sales tax increase, the council has faced heated public hearings over an outside efficiency audit, public utility rate proposals, and long-range development plans along the Sacramento River corridor.

The Circle 6 Efficiency Audit and the Stillwater Data Center Revolt

Redding’s fiscal stability has tightened under compounding pressures: post-pandemic inflation, a 1.2% year-over-year drop in sales tax receipts, and the rejection of Measure A by local voters. Confronting a baseline operating shortfall of roughly $3 million and shrinking reserve margins, municipal administrators launched a comprehensive review of city spending.

Before his death, City Manager Tarbox initiated departmental operational audits, leading the council to approve a sole-source contract of up to $300,000 with Circle 6 Consulting, Inc., including an initial appropriation of $235,230 under the 29th Amendment to Budget Resolution No. 2025-049. The firm was tasked with assessing municipal workflows, evaluating staffing configurations, and uncovering dormant internal reserves.

While Circle 6 initially reported finding $82.6 million in potential cost-saving opportunities, an administrative vetting process validated and released $14.3 million in verified savings. These measures included returning $1.2 million directly to the General Fund, clearing $797,000 in encumbrances, and capturing $780,000 in vacancy savings by freezing 16 open positions. To adjust for labor and overtime obligations, the council also enacted the 28th Amendment to Budget Resolution No. 2025-049, authorizing $1,185,570 in mid-year spending while planning a $938,670 expenditure reduction for the following fiscal cycle.

The consultant's economic development recommendations, however, triggered a swift community backlash.

Circle 6 suggested that the city leverage a $7.9 million state and regional infrastructure grant awarded to Stillwater Business Park to recruit hyperscale commercial data centers. In response, residents mobilized as "No Data Centers in the Northstate!," coordinated by local activist Melody Fowler.

At council meetings on September 1 and September 15, 2026, dozens of residents packed council chambers dressed in black to oppose data center development. Opponents testified that industrial data centers consume vast amounts of municipal water for server cooling, generate continuous low-frequency hums, place massive loads on Redding Electric Utility (REU) generation infrastructure, and create few permanent local jobs once built. Taxpayer advocates and environmental watchdogs—including the Shasta Environmental Alliance and the League of Women Voters—questioned the firm’s methodology, arguing that the validated savings were routine accounting cleanups rather than systemic reforms.

Faced with sustained community opposition, the City Council took decisive action. The dais canceled proposed 4.5% annual REU electric rate increases, announced that the city would not pursue data centers at Stillwater Business Park, and voted to restrict Circle 6’s ongoing services to a project-by-project advisory role.

To prepare the 2027–2029 biennial budget, the council formed a Financial Advisory Committee—including Mayor Mike Littau, Council Member Tenessa Audette, and appointed community members Jason Richart, Michael Quinn, Bruce Dean, and Dennice Maxwell—to lead public workshops examining city revenue models and budget baselines.

The Fall of Advance Redding and the Civic Auditorium Limbo

Along the Sacramento River, the Redding Civic Auditorium has reached an operational impasse.

Built by the city in 1970, the facility had been managed since 2011 by Advance Redding, an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit formed when municipal officials sought to shed the auditorium's $1.9 million annual operating deficit. For years, Advance Redding sustained its operational model by subleasing the venue to Bethel Church for its Bethel School of Supernatural Ministry (BSSM) for $750,000 annually, alongside hosting commercial trade shows and concerts.

The model dissolved when the BSSM sublease concluded. Coupled with shifting post-pandemic event attendance, rising maintenance costs, and deferred structural repairs, Advance Redding accumulated severe operating losses.

To keep the venue open, the City Council approved significant financial assistance:

•

Emergency Grant ($675,000): Approved on September 2, 2025, reallocating restricted facility capital improvement funds to operating expenses and waiving the operator's $23,000 monthly rent obligation through the end of that year.

•

Stopgap Operating Subsidy ($464,000): Approved on February 3, 2026, providing $116,000 per month from the General Fund to keep the doors open through spring civic gatherings.

In total, the city provided $1,139,000 in public funding to Advance Redding across the 2025–2026 fiscal cycle without achieving long-term solvency. When a third transitional bridge grant of $400,000 came before the council on May 19, 2026, a fiscally conservative majority led by Mayor Littau and Council Member Audette voted it down, prompting Advance Redding to announce its exit.

The collapse drew scrutiny from the Shasta County Grand Jury. In an investigative report titled "Redding City Council Grant of Civic Auditorium Capital Improvement Funds to Advance Redding: Was the Public Interest Protected?," grand jurors noted that the initial $675,000 emergency grant was distributed with virtually no audited financial verification or enforceable operational conditions.

Community scrutiny mounted when campaign disclosures revealed that Advance Redding contributed $49,500 to support Measure A—the city's proposed sales tax measure—shortly before asking the city for emergency taxpayer assistance. Public comment sessions saw sharp debates over governance ethics and Bethel Church’s historical relationship with the nonprofit, even though senior church leaders Kris Vallotton and Charlie Harper had resigned from Advance Redding’s board in January 2026.

Advance Redding ceased operations on July 31, 2026, following the Fourth of July Freedom Festival, forcing several touring performances to relocate to the historic Cascade Theatre downtown. While the city approved temporary maintenance funding to preserve previously scheduled community events—including the Ironman 70.3 and the Fly Fishers International conference—the venue faces an uncertain future.

Mothballing the complex to maintain basic security, climate control, and insurance is projected to cost taxpayers $1.2 million annually. Community Services Director Travis Menne issued a revised national Request for Proposals that eliminates monthly rent obligations and permits operators to draw support from municipal Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenues, with a council selection vote expected in late 2026.

The Riverfront Specific Plan and a $74 Million Water Backbone

As the council works to resolve the auditorium's future, municipal planning staff are advancing the Redding Riverfront Specific Plan (RSP) alongside a major recapitalization of the city's drinking water infrastructure.

The RSP establishes updated zoning guidelines, open-space standards, building height limits, and active-transportation pathways across a planning area that includes Caldwell Park, the Civic Auditorium campus, the Diestelhorst Bridge junction, and the Park Marina commercial district.

Following the close of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Notice of Preparation scoping period in March 2026, the draft plan drew opposition from neighboring property owners. Spokesperson Dan Wait, representing the Park Marina Village Homeowners Association, appeared repeatedly before the council to challenge a proposed public active-transportation trail (designated on planning maps as the "blue line") routed adjacent to their 12-home private gated enclave. Wait argued that the pathway infringes on private boundaries, creates security and noise concerns, and degrades homeowner privacy, demanding that city planners remove the segment from the plan.

Environmental organizations, including the Shasta Environmental Alliance (led by David Ledger), the California Native Plant Society, and the Wintu Audubon Society, raised parallel concerns regarding riverbank ecology. Conservation advocates warned that past riverfront projects resulted in the loss of mature valley and interior live oak woodlands and pointed to active bald eagle nesting territories within the corridor, urging the city to enforce strict oak-canopy replacement ratios and developer mitigation fees.

These land-use debates coincide with necessary utility upgrades. On August 18, 2026, the City Council authorized a $74 million construction contract to replace Water Utility Pump Station 1, the municipal intake facility on the Sacramento River that supplies drinking water to approximately 31,000 customers.

To protect municipal utility reserves, the council approved Resolution No. 2026-004, securing low-interest debt financing and complete project reimbursement through the State Water Resources Control Board’s Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. The intake modernization anchors Redding’s broader five-year, $751 million Capital Improvement Plan adopted on June 16, 2026, which directs funding toward regional transportation corridors, storm drainage networks, and park expansions through 2030.

A Defining Period for City Hall

The decisions facing the Redding City Council illustrate the challenge of balancing fiscal restraint with long-term infrastructure maintenance.

While rejecting data centers at Stillwater and pulling back on REU electric rate increases responded directly to public calls for affordability, the city must still fund core services, manage a $1.2 million annual carry on a shuttered civic venue, and replace aging municipal utilities.

As municipal planners finalize the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the riverfront and the Financial Advisory Committee convenes public revenue workshops, the choices made in the coming months will establish Redding’s economic, structural, and cultural footprint for years to come.

The Shasta Times Newsroom Standards: We strive for accuracy, balance, and independence in every dispatch. Corrections and clarifications are reviewed promptly by the editorial staff.

Reader Comments (0)

Shasta County Community Discussion

Join the Discussion

No comments yet on this dispatch. Be the first to share your thoughts above.
The Shasta Times | Shasta County Local News